As we went through the process of editing, revising, and adopting resolutions to be presented to the Texas GOP Convention, a young woman opposed a definition of marriage as a union of one man and one woman. Her argument? Conservative homosexuals would “feel excluded from our party”.
I spoke in favor of the resolution, explaining to the convention delegates how marriage, as we propose it be defined, is a representation of God and His Kingdom, of Christ and the Church. The procreation of humanity is the natural means by which the human race survives on earth; there has never been recorded a single incidence of a homosexual couple producing a child. If a reasonable person rejects the first salient point, he or she cannot reject the second.
The oldest textual documents of the Bible were written around 3,500 years ago. The official canons of the Jewish Bible, the Protestant Bible, and the Catholic Bible incorporate the same ancient documents.
A belief common to both proponents of homosexuality and communism is atheism, the rejection of a belief in God. A workaround of the marriage tenets of the Bible is transgenderism. If somehow a man can assume the disguise of a woman and our society can be forced to accept the disguise as genuine, then the homosexual activists believe the Bible’s teaching can be nullified.
Homosexual activists seek not inclusivity but exclusivity whereby homosexuals in whatever form gain exclusive rights above those of believers in the God of Creation.
Our American founding fathers would agree.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, July 4, 1776, first sentence, second paragraph
President Ronald Reagan warned, “If we ever forget that we are One Nation Under God, then we will be a nation gone under.”
John White
Rockwall, Texas
John N. White 