The U.S. Constitution: Unfit for the Democratic Party

This is not rocket science.

Founding Father John Adams said, “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

Leading Democrats are immoral and atheistic people. The Constitution is most certainly inadequate to govern Democrats. But this was not always so.

I was born and raised in South Texas, where practically everyone was a Democrat: teachers, preachers, business owners, our presidents, my parents, and law enforcement officers. Throughout my childhood and youth, I was not a Christian. Every adult I knew was a Democrat, so it was natural for me to be a Democrat. Here in Rockwall, my beloved Congressman Ralph Hall was also a Democrat.

But, something in the character of my fellow Americans seemed to change. I became a Republican in 1980 when I voted for Ronald Reagan in the Republican Primary election.

The keyword of Barack Obama’s campaign and his presidency was change. Five days before the November 2008 General Election, Barack Obama publicly said, “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.

Barack Obama was born to communist parents. His stepfather was a communist. His maternal grandparents, who raised him, were also communists. It is only natural Barack would embrace socialism. It was only natural he would hold Christianity in disdain.

As reported in Reason magazine, “Once elected, however, President Obama began to sing a different sort of tune. “We’re not just going to be waiting for legislation,” Obama announced. “I’ve got a pen and I’ve got a phone…and I can use that pen to sign executive orders and take executive actions and administrative actions.”

Obama does not respect the Rule of Law, the Constitution, or the foundational principles enshrined in the Declaration of Independence. His support of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt further exposes his alignment with Islamists.

What is causing the fundamental change in the United States of America?

The Pew Research Center reported on October 17, 2019, In U.S., Decline of Christianity Continues at Rapid Pace, An update on America’s changing religious landscape.

in 2018 and 2019, 65% of American adults describe themselves as Christians when asked about their religion, down 12 percentage points over the past decade. Meanwhile, the religiously unaffiliated share of the population, consisting of people who describe their religious identity as atheist, agnostic or “nothing in particular,” now stands at 26%, up from 17% in 2009.

A 26% minority exceeds the societal tipping point of 25%. It has been said, a picture is worth a thousand words.

Alexis de Tocqueville was a French aristocratdiplomatsociologistpolitical scientistpolitical philosopher, and historian. He is best known for his works Democracy in America (appearing in two volumes, 1835 and 1840) and The Old Regime and the Revolution (1856). In both, he analyzed the living standards and social conditions of individuals as well as their relationship to the market and state in Western societies. Democracy in America was published after Tocqueville’s travels in the United States and is today considered an early work of sociology and political science.

Alexis de Tocqueville observed, “Not until I went into the churches of America and heard her pulpits flame with righteousness did I understand the secret of her genius and power. America is great because America is good, and if America ever ceases to be good, America will cease to be great.

Yes, our greatness as a nation was due to Christianity.

28-year-old Abraham Lincoln’s address to the Young Men’s Lyceum of Springfield, Illinois, on January 27, 1838, highlighted the truth that our greatest enemy is within our borders. I quote: “Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant to step the ocean and crush us at a blow? Never! All the armies of Europe, Asia, and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth (our own excepted) in their military chest, with a Bonaparte for a commander, could not by force take a drink from the Ohio or make a track on the Blue Ridge in a trial of a thousand years. At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer. If it ever reach us it must spring up amongst us; it cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen we must live through all time or die by suicide.

Thomas Jefferson’s advice to our situation is timeless.

I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves ; and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education. This is the true corrective of abuses of constitutional power.

Education translates to Jesus’ commission to His disciples, recorded in Matthew 28:16-20.

16 Then the eleven disciples went away to Galilee, to the mountain to which Jesus had directed them. 17 When they saw Him, they worshipped Him. But some doubted. 18 Then Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, “All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. 19 Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to observe all things I have commanded you. And remember, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.” Amen.

We, the believers in Jesus Christ, have a solemn duty to educate our fellow citizens, first about the Kingdom of God and second about the founding principles of the United States of America.

John White
Rockwall, Texas

Published by John White

A lifetime (over 50 years) of experiences with automation and control systems ranging from aerospace navigation, radar, and ordinance delivery systems to the world's first robotic drilling machine for the oil patch, to process-control systems, energy management systems and general problem-solving. At present, my focus is on self-funding HVAC retrofit projects and indoor air quality with a view to preventing infections from airborne pathogens.

Join the Conversation

  1. clubschadenfreude's avatar
  2. Unknown's avatar
  3. John White's avatar

3 Comments

  1. Here’s a nice set of lies from a conservative Christian and orange rapist follower, John White.

    Unsurprisngly, Adams was wrong, and the constitution was made for all Americans.  Surprise, fallible humans make false statements.  Unlike ignorant Christians like John, even Adams doesn’t think that his religion was the only right one.  

    “Leading Democrats are immoral and atheistic people. The Constitution is most certainly inadequate to govern Democrats. But this was not always so.”

    Unsurprisingly, most leading Democrats, if not all of them, are indeed Christians.   John doesn’t like to admit that since it doens’t work with his lies, aka his bearing false witness against others.  Thanks, John, for showing how Christians choose to lie and ignore their god. 

    John was born quite a long time ago, and his claim that somehow he was born in South Texas and wasn’t a Christian is rather hilarious.  And when he was growing up, southern Democrats were what republicans are now.  It’s nothing surprising that John voted for the addled Ronald Reagan. 

    I do enjoy how John simply lies about other people, again, ignoring his god.  President Obama’s keyword was indeed change and it was advocating for a change from the failed policies of presidents like Reagan, Bush, etc, e.g. the lies of “trickle down economics”, etc.  Happily, it worked and Obama saved the US from the recession. 

    Obama may have been born to communist parents.  He was in no way a communist, but that doesn’t fit in with John’s lies either.  Unsurprisngly, Obama didn’t embrace “socialism”.  He embraced helping people.  And if helping people is “socialism”, then I do expect poor ol’ John to cease using public highways, medicare, etc. In his mind, that is socialism too. 

    Alas, for John’s lies, the Obamas are Christians, just like him.  John hates that since he’s a typical Christian who is sure that only his version is the right one.  Curious how John, and indeed every self-professed Christian, cannot do what jesus promised to his true followers.  John et al are frauds.  And not one can claim that the others aren’t Christians, since they can’t even agree on what a Christian is, with dozens, if not far far more, contradictory versions. 

    What’s amusing is that per ol’ JC’s actions in the bible, Jesus is a *communist*. 

    Then John goes on with lots of the typical baseless claims of a conservative white Christian, aka a wannabee nazi.  Funny how Trump used executive orders, so where is the indignation about that, John?

    Curious how US law allows executive orders.  “There is no specific provision in the United States Constitution for Executive Orders. However, Section 1 of Article II (the Executive Power) is generally viewed as granting authority for such orders. Section 1 says simply: “The Executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.” Sections 3 and 4 of Article II provide potential limitations on executive action (including Executive Orders) in stating that the President shall “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed” and in providing for impeachment and removal of the President in cases where the President is convicted of “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.””  – American Bar Association

    So, unlike John’s lies, Obama does respect the rule of law, the Constitution and the foundational principles of the US.  There is no one religion in the US, despite what John would like. 

    Then poor John claims Obama supported the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.  As all things are in the middle east, this one is complicated.  Egypt has been ruled by despots, and they keep failing in their gov’t.  Senator John McCain was also supporting the muslim brotherhood, over other Egyptian factions, so again, it was both parties and John fails with his lies and attempts to claim that Obama is somehow a Muslim.     

    John, like all of his orange rapist supporters, is upset that the US has and will continue to change from the 1950s imaginary ideal where Christians and white men ruled.  He’s upset that his cult doesn’t have the power it once did.

    John also tries to claim that the only reason America succeeded was that it was Christian.  It never has been a Christian country.  The founders expressedly ignored the ignorance, hate and fear in his cult’s book.  De Tocqueville was simply ignorant and wrong.  

    Christians can’t agree on what being “good” even is, since they can’t agree on what morality their imaginary friend wants. 

    We have one thing that makes it hard to attack the US, two oceans to cross, nothing more.  Curious how Lincoln was indeed right since it was people like John and his orange rapist who have attacked the US gov’t on their own.  It wasn’t Obama who tried to stage a coup.  It was Obama who allowed a peaceful transfer of power.  

    Unsurprisngly, John simply lies about what Lincoln actually meant, taking his words out of context.  He doesn’t mention these parts where Lincoln decries the power grabs by this cult and their orange rapist:

     Is it unreasonable then to expect, that some man possessed of the loftiest genius, coupled with ambition sufficient to push it to its utmost stretch, will at some time, spring up among us? And when such a one does, it will require the people to be united with each other, attached to the government and laws, and generally intelligent, to successfully frustrate his designs.

    Distinction will be his paramount object, and although he would as willingly, perhaps more so, acquire it by doing good as harm; yet, that opportunity being past, and nothing left to be done in the way of building up, he would set boldly to the task of pulling down.

    Here, then, is a probable case, highly dangerous, and such a one as could not have well existed heretofore.

    Another reason which once was; but which, to the same extent, is now no more, has done much in maintaining our institutions thus far. I mean the powerful influence which the interesting scenes of the revolution had upon the passions of the people as distinguished from their judgment. By this influence, the jealousy, envy, and avarice, incident to our nature, and so common to a state of peace, prosperity, and conscious strength, were, for the time, in a great measure smothered and rendered inactive; while the deep-rooted principles of hate, and the powerful motive of revenge, instead of being turned against each other, were directed exclusively against the British nation. And thus, from the force of circumstances, the basest principles of our nature, were either made to lie dormant, or to become the active agents in the advancement of the noblest cause–that of establishing and maintaining civil and religious liberty.

    But this state of feeling must fade, is fading, has faded, with the circumstances that produced it.

    I do not mean to say, that the scenes of the revolution are now or ever will be entirely forgotten; but that like every thing else, they must fade upon the memory of the world, and grow more and more dim by the lapse of time. In history, we hope, they will be read of, and recounted, so long as the bible shall be read;– but even granting that they will, their influence cannot be what it heretofore has been. Even then, they cannot be so universally known, nor so vividly felt, as they were by the generation just gone to rest. At the close of that struggle, nearly every adult male had been a participator in some of its scenes. The consequence was, that of those scenes, in the form of a husband, a father, a son or brother, a living history was to be found in every family– a history bearing the indubitable testimonies of its own authenticity, in the limbs mangled, in the scars of wounds received, in the midst of the very scenes related–a history, too, that could be read and understood alike by all, the wise and the ignorant, the learned and the unlearned.–But those histories are gone. They can be read no more forever. They were a fortress of strength; but, what invading foeman could never do, the silent artillery of time has done; the leveling of its walls. They are gone.–They were a forest of giant oaks; but the all-resistless hurricane has swept over them, and left only, here and there, a lonely trunk, despoiled of its verdure, shorn of its foliage; unshading and unshaded, to murmur in a few gentle breezes, and to combat with its mutilated limbs, a few more ruder storms, then to sink, and be no more.

    They were the pillars of the temple of liberty; and now, that they have crumbled away, that temple must fall, unless we, their descendants, supply their places with other pillars, hewn from the solid quarry of sober reason. Passion has helped us; but can do so no more. It will in future be our enemy. Reason, cold, calculating, unimpassioned reason, must furnish all the materials for our future support and defence.–Let those materials be moulded into general intelligence, sound morality, and in particular, a reverence for the constitution and laws: and, that we improved to the last; that we remained free to the last; that we revered his name to the last; that, during his long sleep, we permitted no hostile foot to pass over or desecrate his resting place; shall be that which to learn the last trump shall awaken our WASHINGTON.

    Upon these let the proud fabric of freedom rest, as the rock of its basis; and as truly as has been said of the only greater institution, “the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.”” – Lincoln’s address to the Young Men’s Lyceum of Springfield, Illinois, on January 27, 1838

    Curious how John’s quote from Jefferson also speaks against the lies of John and his fellow wannabee nazis.  ““I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves ; and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education. This is the true corrective of abuses of constitutional power.”

    It’s not democrats who have tried to limit voting by the people. 

    And curious how the bible mentions not one thing about democracy, but only kings and tyrants.  All are to be obeyed without question since this god supposedly put all worldly leaders in their positions. 

    Of course, John ignores that part of his bible too, since Obama was evidently chosen by God to lead the US since he won the election…twice.  Happily, the US isn’t Christian and the nonsense from Matthew 28 shows how Christians fail since they can’t even agree amongst themselves, despite Jesus’ own prayer to himself that Christianity doesn’t split. 

    John claims that Christians have some duty to educate their fellow citizens.  Curiosu how they can’t even educate each other.  We already know about their “kingdom of god” which is imaginary, and the founding principles of the US, which have nothing to do with their cult. 

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

Leave a reply to John White Cancel reply