Judicial activism is a legal term that refers to court rulings that are partially or fully based on the judge’s political or personal considerations, rather than existing laws. In basic terms, judicial activism occurs when a judge presiding over a case allows his personal or political views to guide his decision when rendering judgment on a case. The topic of judicial activism has been a source of controversy in the U.S. political landscape for some time. LegalDictionary: Judicial Activism
Judge Juan Manuel Merchan in the News
Why and How Does Injustice Affect YOU?
“An injustice committed against anyone is a threat to everyone.” — Baron de Montesquieu
“Charles Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu, generally referred to as simply Montesquieu, was a French judge, man of letters, historian, and political philosopher. He is the principal source of the theory of separation of powers, which is implemented in many constitutions throughout the world… Montesquieu was also highly regarded in the British colonies in North America as a champion of liberty. According to a survey of late eighteenth-century works by political scientist Donald Lutz, Montesquieu was the most frequently quoted authority on government and politics in colonial pre-revolutionary British America, cited more by the American founders than any source except for the Bible.”
The Bottom Line
Judge Juan Manuel Merchan is a judicial activist who threatens former President Donald Trump’s rights and freedoms, as well as yours.
The Democratic Party has won first place in the race to undermine our Constitutional Republic as he labors with fellow Democrats to prevent Donald J. Trump from being re-elected to the presidency.
“If we ever forget that we’re one nation under God, then we will be one nation gone under.” — President Ronald Reagan
John White
Rockwall, Texas
John N. White 